Explained! WPL 2025 run-out controversy, here’s what the rule say on LED stumps

Explained! WPL 2025 run-out controversy, here’s what the rule say on LED stumps
Explained! WPL 2025 run-out controversy, here’s what the rule say on LED stumps

New Delhi: The second match of the Women’s Premier League (WPL) was surrounded by three contentious run-out calls in the closing moments of the match with Delhi Capitals, the winner of the match, was at the favourable end of having all the decisions in their corner.

Mumbai Indians, the losing side, turned out to be disappointed as the last-ball run-out, a very closed one, didn’t help them to enforce the match to a super over.

Umpire’s decision based on LED lighting sparks debate

Gayathri Venugopalan was the television (TV) umpire (third umpire) and her decision to rule all three chances as ‘not out’ seemed to be based on the LED lightings not lighting at the point when the wickets were broken.

Shikha Pandey in the 18th over, Radha Yadav in the 19th over, and Arundhati Reddy on the final ball of the 20th over, were challenged for a potential run-out by Mumbai Indians. All three players survived the call as Gayathri, after observing multiple replays, ruled them ‘not out’ with the interpretation being that the stumps didn’t light up at the time when the bails were dislodged.

It soon turned out to be a matter of discussion among experts and fans on television and social media platforms. Former Indian captain Mithali Raj was of the opinion that two of those close calls – including that of Shikha Pandey and Radha Yadav – should have been ruled in support of Mumbai Indians.

“Pandey was given not out while the batter had the bat on the line. When you dive and your bat first hits the ground (inside the crease) and then it [bounces up] because you have to dive full stretch, then it is not out,” Mitahli said on JioStar after the match.
“[But] with Radha Yadav, we can see the blade of the bat up. It is nowhere touching any part of the ground [inside] the crease [when the LED stumps light up]. That means she is out. The bat was never in the crease. That is pretty much out,” the 42-year-old added.
Former New Zealand cricket team head coach Mike Hesson was baffled with the umpire’s verdict against Mumbai Indians.
“Not sure why the umpire tonight has decided that the zinger bails are not applicable? Once bails lights up connection is lost therefore wicket is broken! That is in the playing conditions! Have seen more confusion in last 10 mins than ever before,” Hesson wrote on his X handle.

What does the rule says?

According to the Appendix D of the WPL 2025 playing conditions, which mentions how a run-out mode of dismissal can be adjudged involving LED stumps in the match.

“Where LED wickets are used, the moment at which the wicket has been put down shall be deemed to be the first frame in which the LED lights are illuminated and subsequent frames show the bail permanently removed from the top of the stumps,” the rule reads.

Delhi Capitals won by two wickets in a nail-biting match to complete the moderate 165-run chase.

 The second WPL match saw three contentious run-out decisions involving Delhi Capitals and Mumbai Indians. Umpire Gayathri Venugopalan’s “not out” rulings, based on LED stump lighting, sparked debate. Former players like Mithali Raj and Mike Hesson criticized the decisions.  Cricket Sports News: Latest Cricket News, Cricket Live Score, Sports Breaking News from Sports Today